Forgot password
New User/ Regiser
⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2004 (10) TMI 295 - ITAT JAIPUR
Extract:
.......n making trading additions for both the years. Thus, we are of the opinion that the order of the ld. CIT(A) is not laconic in any manner. Therefore, we decline to interfere with his order. 36. In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for both the years are dismissed and the appeals filed by the Revenue for both the years are also dismissed.