Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1986 (9) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1986 (9) TMI 325 - CEGAT, BOMBAYExtract: .......part of his order. We reject Shri Pattekar rsquo s contention that because the refund claim was made after the coming into force of new Rule, the period of limitation prescribed in the rule applies and not the period of limitation that was existing at the time of payment of duty. 16. In the result, both these appeals fail and the same are rejected.
|