Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases GST GST + HC GST - 2024 (4) TMI HC This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (4) TMI 612 - HC - GST


Issues involved: Show cause notices regarding irregular availment of input tax credit for financial years 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21; Lack of specific details in the notice; Request for time extension to respond to the notice; Alleged discrepancy without a formal show cause notice; Time limitation for adjudicating the notice.

Summary:

1. Lack of Specific Details in Show Cause Notices:
The petitioner was aggrieved by show cause notices concerning irregular availment of input tax credit for the mentioned financial years. The notices lacked specific details regarding the alleged mis-match or irregular availment, leading to a request for more time to respond. The petitioner's counsel highlighted the absence of clarity due to the lack of a formal show cause notice apart from the audit observation.

2. Time Extension Request and Response:
The counsel for the petitioner sought time from the Proper Officer to respond to the show cause notice, which was not granted. However, the respondent's counsel accepted notice and mentioned that the limitation for adjudicating the show cause notice for the financial year 2018-19 ends on a specific date. The Proper Officer assured to provide specific information upon query by the petitioner within the adjudication timeline.

3. Disposal of Petition and Response Deadline:
The petition was disposed of with a direction for the petitioner to file a response to the show cause notice for the financial year 2019-20 and 2020-21 within 30 days. The petitioner's counsel mentioned the voluminous record and potential need for time extension, which can be requested from the department, to be considered in accordance with the law.

4. Further Proceedings and Remedies:
The petitioner was instructed to appear before the Sales Tax Officer for clarification or queries on the specified date. The officer was tasked with adjudicating the notice in compliance with the law. Additionally, the petitioner was granted the liberty to pursue further legal remedies if aggrieved by any subsequent orders from the Proper Officer.

5. Court's Clarification:
The judgment clarified that the Court did not delve into the merits of either party's case, maintaining a neutral stance on the matter.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates