Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1992 (7) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1992 (7) TMI 190 - CEGAT, NEW DELHIExtract: .......)(b). 9. Since we have held that the disputed product was a lsquo perfumed hair oil rsquo classifiable under Tariff Item 14F(ii)(b) even prior to 17-3-1989 it is not necessary for us to examine the question whether the refund claim filed by the appellant was filed within the statutory time limit. 10. In view of the foregoing the appeal is rejected.
|