Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1996 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1996 (3) TMI 269 - AT - Central Excise
Issues:
Whether the "mini computer" is an eligible input for the VAX/DEC units system cleared by the appellants. Analysis: The appeal revolves around determining the eligibility of the "mini computer" as an input for the VAX/DEC units system. The appellant argues that the entire system, including the "mini computer," has been assessed as one entity for duty payment purposes. The appellant contends that the mini computer, although capable of independent functioning, is an integral part of the system supplied to meet specific customer needs. The appellant emphasizes that in the dynamic computer industry, configurations are tailored to customer requirements, enhancing system efficiency. The appellant criticizes the lower authority for not considering the technical necessity of including the mini computer in the system and for focusing solely on its independent functionality. The appellant stresses the importance of aligning with technological advancements and customer demands in determining eligibility for Modvat credit. The respondent, on the other hand, argues that for Modvat credit eligibility, the key consideration is whether an item qualifies as an input directly related to the manufacture of the finished product. The respondent asserts that since the mini computer can function independently, it does not meet the criteria of being an input for the system. However, the appellate tribunal notes that computer systems typically consist of interconnected independent units. The tribunal acknowledges the practice of assessing goods, including the mini computer, as one entity. While recognizing the prima facie validity of the appellant's claim for Modvat credit, the tribunal emphasizes the need for a detailed examination. The tribunal suggests that the lower authority should have sought technical explanations from the appellants regarding the system's capabilities and integration of units to meet specific functional needs. The tribunal underscores the importance of assessing whether the system, as configured and supplied, aligns with industry standards for specific functionalities. In conclusion, the tribunal sets aside the lower appellate authority's decision and remands the matter to the original authority for a fresh consideration. The tribunal directs the original authority to conduct a thorough review in light of the observations made, emphasizing the need for a deeper examination of the system's configuration and technical aspects. The appellants are to be given an opportunity to present their case before a final decision is reached regarding the eligibility of the mini computer as an input for the VAX/DEC units system.
|