Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 2000 (10) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2000 (10) TMI 342 - CEGAT, MUMBAIExtract: .......erthought on the part of Agarwal is again not acceptable. Agarwal while implicating Mehta has also implicated himself. The Supreme Court rsquo s judgment in C.C. v. Naresh J. Sukhwani - 1996 (83) E.L.T. 258 would aptly apply him. We therefore confirm the penalty imposed on him. 7. emsp Appeals C/257/94 and C/40/94 allowed. Appeal C/93/94 dismissed.
|