Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Section Wise 1994 1994 (1) This

Law	-- All -- GST Income Tax Benami Property Customs Corporate Laws Securities / SEBI Insolvency & Bankruptcy FEMA PMLA Service Tax Central Excise CST, VAT & Sales Tax Wealth tax Indian Laws
Court	-- Any -- Supreme Court SC Orders / Highlights High Court Appellate Tribunal Tribunal Appellate authority for Advance Ruling Advance Ruling Authority National Financial Reporting Authority Competition Commission of India ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY Commission Central Government Board DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court Commissioner / Appellate Authority Other
Citation	--Year-- 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 1988 1987 1986 1985 1984 1983 1982 1981 1980 1979 1978 1977 1976 1975 1974 1973 1972 1971 1970 1969 1968 1967 1966 1965 1964 1963 1962 1961 1960 1959 1958 1957 1956 1955 1954 1953 1952 1951 1950 Upto 1949 - -Volume- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 -
Landmark	Nil - N/A Referred in >= 3 Cases Referred in >= 4 Cases Referred in >= 5 Cases Referred in >= 10 Cases Referred in >= 15 Cases Referred in >= 25 Cases Referred in >= 50 Cases Referred in >= 100 Cases
Order by	TMI Citation Date of Decision

Advanced Search Options

Case Laws

Showing 261 to 266 of 266 Records

• 1994 (1) TMI 6 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT
  

  A Firm, Partner In Firm, Rectification Of Mistakes, Rectification Proceedings, Share Income, Total Income

  ---

• 1994 (1) TMI 5 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
  

  Actual User, Capital Asset, Capital For Purposes, Computation Of Capital, Industrial Undertaking, Special Deduction

  ---

• 1994 (1) TMI 4 - MADRAS HIGH COURT
  
  ... ...
  ... ... ..... all. In CIT v. Paranjothi Salt Co. (1995) 211 ITR 141 (T. C. No. 886 of 1983, order delivered today). We had occasion to consider a similar question with reference to the contents of documents almost identical as in this case and we have held that the instruments cannot be regarded as hundis so as to attract the application of section 69D of the Act. We, therefore, answer the first question referred to us in the negative and against the Revenue. With reference to the second question, in view of the answer returned on the first, section 69D cannot be applied and there is, therefore, no question of any failure to issue account payee cheques. Only in the event of the applicability of section 69D of the Act, the further question with reference to issue of account payee cheques would arise and in view of the answer returned on the first question, the second question does not arise. We accordingly return the second question unanswered. There will, however, be no order as to costs.

  ---

• 1994 (1) TMI 3 - MADRAS HIGH COURT
  

  Offences and Prosecution - Held that the proper course is to put forward the contentions before the trial court and section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, cannot be invoked when there are statutory remedies provided under the Code of Criminal Procedure itself, particularly when the question of framing of charges has actually arisen. - these petitions fail and shall stand dismissed. The trial court is directed to dispose of the cases expeditiously.

  ---

• 1994 (1) TMI 2 - SUPREME COURT
  

  Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the share of profit derived by Smt. Kiran Kumar, wife of the assessee, from the firm in which her husband is a partner as the karta of his Hindu undivided family, cannot be clubbed by applying the provisions of section 64 in the individual assessment of her husband in the status of an individual

  ---

• 1994 (1) TMI 1 - SUPREME COURT
  

  Appeals against the order of the Settlement Commission - jurisdiction of the Settlement Commission under Chapter XIX-A - Commission has no right to hold that they will not look into the material collected after the date of filing of the application under section 245C - mere filing of the application did not mean that department should fold their hands and stop their investigation and enquiries in their tracks - order of the Settlement Commission under appeal is set aside

  ---

1 ....1011121314