Case Laws |
Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Section Wise 1999 1999 (5) This
|
Advanced Search Options
Case Laws
Showing 381 to 386 of 386 Records
-
1999 (5) TMI 6 - SC ORDER
Whether, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in allowing investment allowance under section 32A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the excavator, which was used for excavation of earth at site - Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is correct in holding that the Assessing Officer cannot verify which machinery was used for contract work in proceedings under section 154 - Tribunal to state the case and refer the abovee two questions of law to HC
-
1999 (5) TMI 5 - SC ORDER
Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the assessee-company was entitled to export markets development allowance under section 35B(1)(b) in respect of expenditure incurred for foreign indenting business even though the services in this connection were rendered in India - High Court was not justified in holding that assessee-company was entitled to export markets development allowance under section 35B(1)(b)
-
1999 (5) TMI 4 - SC ORDER
In view of the provision in s. 10(29A)(d) introduced in the Finance Act, 1999, the Tobacco Board's income becomes exempt for any assessment year w.e.f. April 1, 1975, or the previous year in which the Board was constituted. Hence, the assessments already made stand set aside by virtue of s. 10(29A)(d) with retrospective effect - appeal is allowed holding that there is no liability to income-tax as provided in s. 10(29A)(d) - appellant are entitled to refund consequent to retrospective amendment
-
1999 (5) TMI 3 - SUPREME COURT
In view of this circular of October 9, 1984, which was then in force and which was binding on the assessing authorities, the interest on sticky advances in those years could not be taxed - hence Assessing Officer was right in not taxing the interest in suspense account for the assessment year 1981-82 in view of the Circular dated October 9, 1984.
-
1999 (5) TMI 2 - SUPREME COURT
Appellant, a judge of the Allahabad High Court - He filed his income-tax return on the basis that the salary that he received as a judge was not liable to tax under the Income-tax Act, 1961 - held that judges' can be taxed by Act of Parliament - hence appeal is dismissed
-
1999 (5) TMI 1 - CEGAT, CALCUTTA
Service Tax – (Reference to High Court) Delay submission of ST-3 return and not filed in prescribed form ST-3 imposition of penalty is mandatory
....
|
|