No penalty if there is mass unawareness about taxability of certain service

[Bimal jain]

Dear Professional Colleague,

No penalty if there is mass unawareness about taxability of certain service

We are sharing with you an important judgment of the Hon’ble Allahabad High Court in the case of H.M. Singh and Co. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax [2014 (9) TMI 218 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT] on the following issue:

Issue:

Whether penalty could be levied under Section 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 (“the Finance Act”) despite the fact that the entire tax liability as well as interest was deposited before passing of adjudicating order and there was mass unawareness about taxability of impugned service?

Facts and background:

H.M. Singh and Co. (“the Appellant”) was served a Show Cause Notice dated September 29, 2010 by the Department demanding Service tax on the ground that during the period from April 2005 to March 2010, the Appellant had received Provident Funds payments relating to manpower supplied by it to the Hindalco Industries Limited, Renukoot (“Service recipient”) and had not included the same in the assessable value for the purpose of calculation of Service tax.

The Appellant made payment of Service tax along with interest during June 2011 to October 2011. Thereafter, the Department passed an adjudicating order dated November 24, 2011 and levied penalty under Section 77 and 78 of the Finance Act (with option to pay 25% penalty within 30 days) which was further upheld by the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) and the Hon’ble Tribunal.

Being aggrieved, the Appellant preferred an appeal before the Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad contesting the amount of penalty on the following grounds:

• There was no case of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts within the meaning of Section 78 of the Finance Act or of a contravention with intent to evade payment of Service tax.
• The Appellant’s bona fide intentions are well established from the fact that the alleged amount of Service tax with interest was deposited without waiting for an order of adjudication.
• Nearly two-hundred notices had been issued by the division and Commissionerates at Allahabad on same issue which indicates that there was mass unawareness among the service providers in the stated area which was also noted in an order of the Joint Commissioner (Adjudication), Central Excise, Allahabad dated June 16, 2011.

Held:

The Hon’ble High Court of Allahabad relied upon following judgments:

• Anand Nishikawa Co. Ltd. Vs. CCE [2005 (9) TMI 331 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ;
• Padmini Products Vs. Collector of Central Excise [1989 (8) TMI 80 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA]

and held that the Appellant’s conduct in paying Service tax even prior to adjudication was relevant factor depicting bona fide intentions of the Appellant.

Further, since there was mass unawareness on the issue involved, as even noted by Department itself, there was no case of fraud, collusion, willful misstatement or suppression of facts within the meaning of Section 78 of the Finance Act or of a contravention with intent to evade payment of Service tax. Hence, penalty could not be levied.

Hope the information will assist you in your Professional endeavors. In case of any query/ information, please do not hesitate to write back to us.

Thanks and Best Regards

Bimal Jain

FCA, FCS, LLB, B.Com (Hons.)

Flat No. 34B, Ground Floor, Pocket-1,

Mayur Vihar, Phase–I, Delhi – 110091

Desktel: +91-11-22757595/42427056

Mobile: +91 9810604563

Email: bimaljain@hotmail.com

Website: www.a2ztaxcorp.com

Disclaimer: The contents of this document are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the authors nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this document nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Readers are advised to consult the professional for understanding applicability of this newsletter in the respective scenarios. While due care has been taken in preparing this document, the existence of mistakes and omissions herein is not ruled out. No part of this document should be distributed or copied (except for personal, non-commercial use) without our written permission.