Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2005 (9) TMI 538 - CESTAT, MUMBAIExtract: ....... date of return of the goods therefore is important and is not under challenge. The original invoices issued by the appellants are only evidences of the duty paid nature of the goods and not date of return invoice/challans etc. issued by the Railways. There is no violation of Rule 57G(2) established. Appeal therefore rejected. (Pronounced in Court)
|