Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + SC Indian Laws - 1977 (11) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1977 (11) TMI 130 - SC - Indian LawsWhether the transaction could be held to be prudent and binding on the members of coparcenary? Held that:- Appeal allowed. The family of Ramniranjandas Murarka became divided in status before 1932 and that in any even- a division in status was effected from the date of the document Ex. L etc. in 1932, and that even if there was a joint family in existence as the transactions were for the benefit of the family, the other coparceners cannot challenge its validity. In the result the appeal is allowed and the decree of the trial court is set aside so far as the appellants, Defendant 12 and Defendant 13, are concerned. Costs will be paid by the contesting respondents who are legal representatives of R- 12, Bimla and Rahul, and R-20 and his three sons R-42, R-43,
|