Forgot password
New User/ Regiser
⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1978 (10) TMI 150 - SUPREME COURT
Extract:
.......n in the negative. In view of this answer, it is not necessary to deal with the other contention raised by the respondent to the effect that the aforesaid notification being of a subsidiary character, it was not necessary to lay it before both Houses of Parliament to make it valid. In the result, the appeal fails and is dismissed. Appeal dismissed.