Home Case Index All Cases Indian Laws Indian Laws + SC Indian Laws - 2006 (8) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2006 (8) TMI 601 - SUPREME COURTWhether in terms of the proviso appended to Rule 16 (2A), the State of Assam could not have accepted the offer of voluntary retirement? Whether the offer of the appellant to retire voluntarily could have been accepted only prior to 1.8.1997 in terms of the circulars issued by the Central Government, as the employee has a right to withdraw the offer even after acceptance by the State Government? Whether the respondents being public authorities, were bound to follow the Rules laid down by the Central Government which alone could have applied its mind to the request of the appellant and not the State of Assam?
|