|| New User || My profile || My Book Marks || SMS Services || Annual Subscription || Lost Password ||
Stay
TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Refund claim rejected as time bared - the amount deposited by the appellant during the investigation can never be construed as a duty - it is held as deposited under protest - refund allowed - Tri Abatement of duty - Rule 10 of the Pan Masala Packing Rules – Just because the Superintendent s remark regarding sealing does not mention the time of sealing, it cannot be presumed that on 4th April 2009 and 3rd July 2009, the factory had operated. - Tri As the data is being retrieved or access by the applicants to their own database which were in US, UK and India, therefore, it cannot be prima facie held as import of services - Tri Free call services provided to employees by cellular companies - pre deposit ordered by the CESTAT to the extent of Rs. 80 crores reduced to Rs. 25 crores. - HC Valuation - import of replicators - purchase of DVDs from India - the licence fee and royalty paid by the respondent to the licensor is includable in the value of the goods purchased from the replicator(s). - Tri Valuation of shares - Difference between value of share on the date of its allotment and the price of warrant paid as per letter of allot - proviso (iv) of section 48 not applicable - Tri Reopening of assessment - The prime requirement for the validity of a notice issued under section 148 is that the reasons recorded should have a live link or nexus with the material on record. - HC There is no need to discuss provisions of sections 70, 71 & 32(2) elaborately as the CIT erred in coming to the conclusion that current year's depreciation cannot be allowed to be set off against capital gains. - Tri Residential status - foreign going vessel - he was outside Indian territory for 230 days and the requirement of section 6 for being outside India for 182 days, he become 'non-resident'. - Tri Transfer of the merchant banking business - nature of the transfer does not attract the provision of section 50B in relation to slump sale also as there is no transfer of an undertaking by the assessee. - Tri Bad debts / business loss - The loans given to staff has been written off since the same are irrecoverable in view of transfer of the merchant banking business. - deduction allowed - Tri U.P. Value Added Act, 2008 - every dealer holding registration certificate under the erstwhile Act, as a dealer, is deemed to be registered under the new Act - non-obtaining of biometrics data, as in the instant case, will not invalidate the registration certificate. - HC Petitioner is not personally liable to pay the outstanding dues under the U.P. Trade Tax/Sales Tax Act of the Private Limited Company but under CST he is liable to pay the dues - HC Refund claim denied - period of limitation - cause of action arose only on 15/11/06, when they paid for the second time as a result of audit objection - refund claim is withing period - Tri Rejection of Refund claim – appellant filed under protest letter on 7.1.1987. - after two days they filed six nos. classification lists - thus, the under protest letter has no effect in the eye of law - Tri An educational qualification recognized by law will not cease to be recognized by law merely because for practicing in the field to which the qualification relates, a further examination held by a body regulating that field of practice is to be taken. - HC Fulfillment of export obligation – it is not open to the customs authorities to presume that extension of the LOP would be granted by the Development Commissioner to facilitate evasion of duty. - HC Merely because the CIT is having a different view, the same would not entitle him to initiate revision proceedings u/s 263, if the view taken by the assessing officer is one of the possible views. - Tri    Left Stop Right

Please login.

Only paid members can access this page.

User Login
Username  
Password  
 
Stay sign in
 
 
 
New User / Registeration
Forget Password - Click here to retrieve your Password

 

2012 (2) TMI 220 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Great Offshore Limited & Others Versus The Commissioner of Customs (Import) & Others

Ocean going vessels – seizure for not filing B/E for home consumption - provisional release of vessels ordered subject to conditions including condition of payment of duty – vessels imported prior to 2001 – exemption from custom duty on the date of initial import – assessee contesting payment of duty – Held that:- Revenue is not justified in demanding the duty for provisional release of the vessels when, prima facie, it is not in dispute that on the date of initial import of these ocean going vessels, there was total exemption from payment of duty and customs authorities were also under the belief that it is not necessary to file B/E, where there is total exemption.

Since the issue is yet to be adjudicated hence petitioner is directed to file B/E for home clearance of each of the vessels in question without payment of any duty and other conditions as stipulated in order for provisional release. No opinion is expressed on merits of the case.

 
what is new what is new
Advanced Search
Subscription
Annual Subscription
Consultancy Services
Modes of Payment
Updates
Highlights
Recent Case Laws
Recent Notifications
Recent Circulars
Event Calendar
Articles
News / Feeds
Experts
Newsletters
FAQ - Newsletters
Archive - Newsletters
Communication
Contact - Us
Feedback / Suggestion
Other Options
Compute Income Tax
Refer to Friend
Important Links
Advertise with us
Quick Links: || Acts and Rules || Notifications || Circulars || Schedules || Forms || Case Laws || Members ||
| Home | | About us | | Contact us | | Refer us | | Feed Back | | Disclaimer | | Terms of Use | | Privacy Policy | | Discussion Forum |
Go To Top

Go to Mobile Website

© Taxmanagementindia.com [A unit of MS Knowledge Processing Pvt. Ltd.] All rights reserved.