Forgot password
New User/ Regiser
⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2001 (12) TMI 71 - SUPREME COURT
Whether two learned judges of this court can disagree with a judgment of three learned judges of this court and whether, for that reason, they can refer the matter before them directly to a Bench of five judges?
Held that:- Judicial discipline and propriety demands that a Bench of two learned judges should follow a decision of a Bench of three learned judges. But if a Bench of two learned judges concludes that an earlier judgment of three learned judges is so very incorrect that in no circumstances can it be followed, the proper course for it to adopt is to refer the matter before it to a Bench of three learned judges setting out, as has been done here, the reasons why it could not agree with the earlier judgment. If, then, the Bench of three learned judges also comes to the conclusion that the earlier judgment of a Bench of three learned judges is incorrect, reference to a Bench of five learned judges is justified.
Thus are of the view that these matters could only have been referred to a Bench of three learned judges. We, accordingly, order that they shall be placed before a Bench of three learned judges. Having regard to the lapse of time, they shall be so placed in January, 2002.