Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1987 (4) TMI 85 - HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYExtract: .......an application made under rule 7. Therefore, it is not correct to say that refixation of the drawback was illegal. Once this conclusion is reached, it follows that the order for adjustment fits into the purview of rule 14. The petitions fail and hence the order - 9. Rule in both petitions, discharged with parties being left to bear their own costs.
|