Forgot password
New User/ Regiser
⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1972 (9) TMI 9 - SUPREME COURT
Fixed deposits - fact that the holder of the deposit could not gift satisfactory explanation regarding the sales would not be decisive. The material on record did not support the claim of the department that the amount belonged to the firm - No case, in our opinion, has been made for interfering with the judgment of the High Court. The appeals, consequently, fail and are dismissed
