Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1992 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1992 (3) TMI 203 - CEGAT, BOMBAYExtract: .......in allowing the same, and when Section 35Q of the Act permits representation through a lawyer also, the order of the adjudicating authority cannot be held as bad in law. 27. The appeal, thus merits no consideration and hence I concur with the finding as proposed by my learned brother Shri R. Jayaraman, Member (Technical) that it has to be rejected.
|