Home Case Index All Cases Central Excise Central Excise + AT Central Excise - 1995 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1995 (3) TMI 222 - CEGAT, MADRASExtract: .......bstantive provision of Rule 57A would not come into operation. It is for this reason it has been held that the subsequent amendment of Rule 57E providing for the later contingency above is only clarificatory in nature. In view of the above matter we hold that no question of law arises for reference. The Reference Application is therefore, rejected.
|