Home Case Index All Cases Companies Law Companies Law + SC Companies Law - 1959 (11) TMI SC This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
1959 (11) TMI 22 - SUPREME COURTWhether the liquidators had remained in occupation of the premises not for the purpose of winding up but "because they could not think of any suitable method of getting rid of the premises in spite of all their desire to do so? Held that:- Unable to agree with the High Court that under rule 97 of the Company Rules, if the premises remained in the occupation of the liquidators, not for the purpose of winding up, the landlord is entitled to priority in respect of payment of rent. On the view taken by us, the appeal will be allowed, the order passed by the High Court set aside and the order passed by Mr. Justice Brij Mohan Lall restored with costs in this court and in the High Court.
|