Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum VAT + CST This
A Public Forum.
Anyone can participate to share knowledge.
We acknowledge the contributions of Experts/ Authors.

Submit new Issue / Query

Branch Transfer against Form F, VAT + CST

Issue Id: - 106513
Dated: 10-2-2014
By:- Seetha Lakshmi

Branch Transfer against Form F


  • Contents

Sir,

We are supplied material on 31st of october from our branch to head office in other state they have recd material in the month of 5th of November. we are supplied some more materials also in the month of November the recd same month itself. In that case they have issued Form F totally in month of November Itself. But in AG Audit they are not accepting the Form F. They ask we to pay Full tax. Please give us suggestion for this matter. 

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 3 of 3 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 11-2-2014
By:- Ganapathy Subrmaniyan

1)      46 VST 275(Mad) Ashoka Sweets: CST – Dealer transferred the goods to Pollachi, from where goods moved to sister concern at Kerala.  AO verified all documents, Form F, Pattials etc., and granted exemption u/s 6A.  Later revised, because in Form XX, mentioned as “our branch”.  HC on the basis of Ashok Leyland case 134 STC 473 = 2004 (1) TMI 365 - SUPREME COURT OF INDIA allowed the petition.  Form F has NOT been proved as false

2.      25 VST 309 CSTAA: Sri Venkateswara Steel Industries,Salem: The AO made original asst accepting Branch transfer.  On the basis of Inspection revision made mechanically treating it as Interstate Sales with PENALTY.  Held, asst on all the sales as Interstate sales not permissible owing to paucity of evidence.  PENALTY not permissible when the dealer had disclosed all the evidences

 


2 Dated: 11-2-2014
By:- Mritunjay Kumar

Please elaborate the reasons they are giving for non-acceptance of Form-F. Prima facie, it seems that demand made is illegal.


3 Dated: 12-2-2014
By:- Pradeep Khatri

Dear Seeta Lakshmi,

The Central Sales Tax (Registration and Turnover) Rules, 1957, Rule 12 (1) Provided also that where, in the case of any transaction of sale, the delivery of goods is spread over to different financial years it shall be necessary to furnish a separate declaration or certificate in respect of goods so delivered in each financial year.

Regards,

Team YAGAY & SUN

(Indirect Tax Consultants)


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates