Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Service Tax This
A Public Forum.
Anyone can participate to share knowledge.
We acknowledge the contributions of Experts/ Authors.

Submit new Issue / Query

Violation of reverse charge, Service Tax

Issue Id: - 109820
Dated: 2-2-2016
By:- Pawan Agarwal

Violation of reverse charge


  • Contents

Respected Seniors,

If i received a service which falls under reverse charge mechanism but by mistake service provider charges service tax on his bill and i pay the bill with service tax then..

A) Should I am liable to pay service tax again under reverse charge??

B) Can i avail cenvat credit of service tax paid to service provider on the basis of his invoice?

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 9 of 9 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 2-2-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sh.Pawan Agarwal Ji,

No. Both (Service Provider and Service Receiver) have to pay their due ST independently. Service Provider cannot deposit the whole amount of ST (including Service Receiver's due). If Service Provider has paid Service Receiver's ST, he is required to apply for refund of ST paid in excess.


2 Dated: 2-2-2016
By:- CS RAHUL AGARWAL

You need not to avail credit on the basis of SP's invoice as it is not admissible in RCM and shall be dismissed straight forward. You pay your liability in terms of reverse charge and then claim refund for the amount so paid.


3 Dated: 2-2-2016
By:- Ganeshan Kalyani
Yes the law is clear as explained by my learned friends. However I have come across a judgement where the decision was given favorable on the conclusion that there is revenue neutral. Anyway it is not advisable to take shelter of the case law when the law is crystal clear. Thanks.

4 Dated: 3-2-2016
By:- YAGAY AND SUN

Yes, there are certain judgments available which enumerates that if S.T. is paid inadvertently by the provider of the services then it cannot be demanded again from the recipient of service under Reverse Charge Mechanism.


5 Dated: 4-2-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

M/s.YAGAY AND SUN,

Sir, There are such judgments. I agree. Now Govt. and Courts (including CESTAT, Commissioner(Appeals) etc. have become strict. Nobody can deny refund as pointed out by you but if Service Provider pays the dues of Service Receiver or Service Receiver pays the dues of Service Provider in the guise of some agreement that agreement will be in violation of Service Tax provisions and will attract penalty. Govt. will also earn interest from that person who does not pay ST on the ground that SP has paid. So assessee has to be careful.


6 Dated: 4-2-2016
By:- Pawan Agarwal

Respected Seniors,

Thanks a lost for your valuable comments.

What I, understand from the discussion is although there is no revenue loss to the department, provisions mentioned in law should be followed religiously otherwise penal provisions can be applied.

1. Service provider has to claim refund of the amount paid.

2. Service recipient has to pay service tax on RCM and avail credit of the same.

Regards,

CA Pawan Agarwal.


7 Dated: 4-2-2016
By:- Ganeshan Kalyani
Absolutely right. Further it is nice to read a confirmation message from the querist otherwise in many a time query is posted and the querist disappears leaving the experts to discuss the issue among themselves. though the benefit is taken from the discussion by not only the querist himself but also the onlooker who are also eager to learn from the valuable discussion. Nice forum. Thanks.

8 Dated: 5-2-2016
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Sh.Ganeshan Kalyani Ji,

Your observations are par excellence. Querist may disappear but there are so many visitors of this site/forum who get benefit of our discussion. Our discussion helps them to manufacture opinion about any issue. I would like to call the experts of this firm as "Torchbearer" who serve not only TMI but also nation free of charge. Hats off to Experts as well as TMI.


9 Dated: 5-2-2016
By:- Mahir S

The views expressed above by Pawan Agarwal ji in his reply dated 04.02.2016 is correct.

Further, as explained by others, it it is a genuine one time mistake then it may be allowed and may be condoned.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates