Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise This
A Public Forum.
Anyone can participate to share knowledge.
We acknowledge the contributions of Experts/ Authors.

Submit new Issue / Query

Cenvat credit on Weighbridge difference, Central Excise

Issue Id: - 111533
Dated: 20-2-2017
By:- Aitha RajyaLakshmi

Cenvat credit on Weighbridge difference


  • Contents

The percentage of Weighbridge difference that is allowed for Cenvat credit is----------------------------

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 7 of 7 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 20-2-2017
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Cement - 1% error permissible on net quantity by weight

Circular No. 876/14/2008-CX, dated 20-10-2008


2 Dated: 20-2-2017
By:- MUKUND THAKKAR

your product please ...


3 Dated: 20-2-2017
By:- Aitha RajyaLakshmi

Cement. In respect or raw material, what is the % of Weighbridge difference that is allowed for availing Cenvat Credit?


4 Dated: 20-2-2017
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Modvat/Cenvat - Inputs gone in waste - Credit on inputs gone in waste during process of repacking of detergent powder not deniable

The Supreme Court Bench comprising Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Ruma Pal and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhan on 7-10-2002 after condoning the delay dismissed the Civil Appeal No. D17281 of 2002 filed by Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi against CEGAT Order No. A/373/2002-NB, dated 7-3-2002 and reported in 2002 (150) E.L.T. 175 (Tri. - Del.) =  2002 (3) TMI 176 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI (Commissioner v. I.P.F. Vikram India Ltd.). While dismissing the appeal, the Supreme Court passed the following order :-

“Delay condoned.

The civil appeal is dismissed on merits”.

The Appellate Tribunal in its impugned order had held that for the purpose of Modvat, where process of repacking the bulk detergent powder into small containers amounts to manufacture, credit on inputs gone in waste during the process not deniable.

[Commissioner v. I.P.F. Vikram India Ltd. - 2003 (153) E.L.T. A303 (S.C.) = 2002 (10) TMI 791 - SUPREME COURT]


5 Dated: 20-2-2017
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Clear-cut percentage is not available. In view of the decision of the Supreme Court and Board's circular, analogy can be applied.


6 Dated: 20-2-2017
By:- YAGAY AND SUN

7 Dated: 21-2-2017
By:- KASTURI SETHI

Thanks to M/S. YAGAY AND SUN for posting specific case law.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates