Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Discussions Forum
Home Forum Central Excise This
A Public Forum.
Anyone can participate to share knowledge.
We acknowledge the contributions of Experts/ Authors.

Submit new Issue / Query

Invoice Series Issue, Central Excise

Issue Id: - 4414
Dated: 24-7-2012
By:- Prashant patra

Invoice Series Issue


  • Contents

Dear Experts

Pl. suggest your opinion on below

We have sent our consignment to West Bengal vide invoice no. 303 on dated 04.07.12 due to some waybill value concern we have split the same invoice & give a seris like 303 & 303 A.

This is not correct as per the laws but i need your expert opinion to resolve this.

Best Regards

Prashant patra

Posts / Replies

Showing Replies 1 to 2 of 2 Records

Page: 1


1 Dated: 30-7-2012
By:- Pradeep Khatri

Well, it is a settled legal position that Invoices will be serially numbered and putting any suffix is not allowed.  Bring the facts of this event to the knowledge of the concerned department to show your bonafide (as there is no evasion of taxes involved) to cope with any unwanted situation in the future.


2 Dated: 2-8-2012
By:- vijay kumar

Dear Sir, your action is in violation of Rule 11(2)  of CER, 2002,. In your ER-1 return also, there is no way you can show 303A. Hence, the best way to resolve the issue is to bring the same to the notice of the Department to avoid any future complications clearly stating the value and duty paid and the reason for splitting the invoice into two.


Page: 1

Old Query - New Comments are closed.

Quick Updates:Latest Updates