No penalty or interest can be imposed for non-fulfillment of an ...

Income Tax

September 3, 2013

No penalty or interest can be imposed for non-fulfillment of an act which a Notified Party is prevented from doing by reason of the Special Court Act. - Assessee cannot therefore be foisted with interest liability under section 234A, 234B and 234C - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

No penalty or interest can be imposed for non-fulfillment of an ...

Income Tax

September 3, 2013

You may also like:

Levy of penalty - Generalia specialibus non derogant - levy of special penalty over general penalty - the Commissioner perfectly justified in imposing penalty under...

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance - The assessee has shown sufficient cause for non-compliance, moreover, such non-compliance was done by...

Non-disclosure of certain material information in the offer documents - This is a fit case where no penalty could be imposed and the question of imposing the maximum...

Imposition of penalty under Section 78 - Merely because penalty under Section 78 has been imposed for the earlier period, no penalty can be imposed for any subsequent...

Penalty u/s. 271G - assessee did not provide any basis for comparing the transactions and it failed to provide any alternative method to benchmark the transactions which...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 and 117 of CA on CHA and G card holder - mis-classification and mis-declaration of goods - The negligence of both the appellants herein is...

Penalty imposed u/s. 271B - non filing of audit report within stipulated time - the assessee kept on changing its version for causing delay of filing tax audit report...

Levying penalty u/s 271D - Accepting loan / deposits in cash from relatives in violation of section 269SS - the assessee has taken loans from relatives to finance her...

Levy of penalty - There are no reason why the said benefit cannot be extended to the penalty imposed under Section 76, since both the Sections are to be read along with...

Levy of penalty on Proprietor of the Firm under Rule 26(2) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - fraudulent availment of CENVAT Credit - Taking note of the fact that penalty...

Penalty u/s 271D or 271E - Penalty u/s.271D or 271E of the Act is concerned, those are independent proceedings and having nothing to do with assessment proceedings or...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The fact remains that the specific issue mentioned and has been examined and the contention of the assessee accepted by the Assessing Officer....

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Merely because the AO did not write specific reasons for accepting the explanation of the assessee cannot be reason enough to invoke powers...

Revision u/s 263 - The fact remains that the specific issue raised, in the revision order was specifically looked into, detailed submissions were made and these...

Quick Updates: