We really fail to understand that if the appellant started ...

Service Tax

December 13, 2013

We really fail to understand that if the appellant started paying a tax under the category of mining services w.e.f. 1.6.2007, how the said action of the assessee would reflect upon their malafide or any suppression or mis-statement of facts with an intent to evade payment of tax, during the relevant period under the category of ‘Technical Testing and Analysis’ - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

We really fail to understand that if the appellant started ...

Service Tax

December 13, 2013

You may also like:

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Mining services / activities - composite contract - prima facie liable to service tax only from 1-6-2007 - AT

Extended period of limitation - if the appellant started paying a tax under the category of mining services w.e.f. 1.6.2007, how the said action of the assessee would...

Adjustment excess tax paid under Rule 6(3) - first service tax was paid but later adjusted on the ground that other party is liable to pay service tax - stay granted - AT

Adjustment of excess paid service tax – rule 6(3) of STR, 1994

Suo motu adjustment of excess service tax paid – Rule 6(4A) - stay granted.

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Works Contract - Levy of service tax prior to 1.6.2007 - Whether service tax can be levied on indivisible works contracts prior to the introduction, on 1st June, 2007,...

Commercial and Industrial Construction Services - The appellants are liable to pay service tax under Works' Contract services with effect from 1.6.2007 - Demand...

Eligibility to make adjustment of excess service tax paid against future service tax liability - Claim of Excess service tax paid due to issuance of revised invoice -...

Disllowance of CENVAT Credit - Rule 6(5) of CCR provides that the provisions of Rule 6(1), (2) and (3) are not applicable, where input service received is used both for...

CENVAT Credit - input services - Irrespective of the person whether it is service recipient or service provider is liable to pay the service tax but so long the service...

Construction services - after 1.6.2007, demand in respect of composite contracts would fall under works contract service only - the demand of service tax under...

Service tax on Works Contract - Section 65(105)(zzzza) - Whether works contract service is chargeable to service tax, prior to 1.6.2007 - matter referred to 5 member bench - AT

Nature of transaction - Classification of services - Supply of Tangible Goods Services or GTA Services - the same transaction could not be levied to service tax both at...

Quick Updates: