Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2010 Year 2010 This

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not ...

Income Tax

November 10, 2010

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - furnished wrong particulars of its income in terms of profits u/s 115JB - Computation of Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) - levy of penalty confirmed - AT

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - additions/ disallowances made under normal provisions of the Act, if ultimately the tax liability is determined u/s 115JB - No penalty

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - MAT u/s 115JB was greater than the regular income, book profit was taken as deemed total income u/s 115JB of the Act - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the fact that assessee has furnished inaccurate particulars for the purpose of determining the tax u/s 115JB stands established - penalty confirmed - HC

  7. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - not offering correct MAT on the book profit u/s 115JB - assessee had not furnished any detail of MAT calculation and also had not filed form 29B...

  8. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition made on protected assessment - addition in this case was made on protected assessment/addition on estimated basis which is against the law - AT

  9. MAT - Addition of Book Profits u/s 115JB – Dividend Stripping u/s 94(7) - The Explanation (f) of Section 115JB was clearly applicable in case of the appellant - AT

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when we examine penalty levied on account of salary disallowance AO has merely made adhoc addition by way of guess work and the AO has not...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates