CENVAT Credit - there was no suppression, fraud, misstatement ...

Central Excise

April 5, 2014

CENVAT Credit - there was no suppression, fraud, misstatement etc. with an intent to evade duty - supplementary invoices raised by M/s Maruti Udyog Ltd. have to be held as eligible document - credit allowed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

CENVAT Credit - there was no suppression, fraud, misstatement ...

Central Excise

April 5, 2014

You may also like:

Refund of unutilized Cenvat credit - Other than Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, there is no other provision either in Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 or in Central Excise...

Distribution of credit by the Input service distributor (ISD) - distribution of proportionate credit - the allegation of suppression, fraud, collusion, wilful...

CENVAT Credit - duty paying documents - Rule 9(1)(a) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 - CENVAT Credit on the basis of photocopy of seven bills of entry - Credit allowed - AT

Cenvat Credit - Outdoor catering - input services - Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules(CCR), 2004 – statutory obligation under the Factories Act

Availment of cenvat credit by the appellant is incorrect as the provisions of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 do not permit the availment of cenvat credit wherein duty has...

Refund of CENVAT Credit under rule 5 of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - Notification

Denial of CENVAT credit - though the appellant has availed CENVAT credit belatedly which is well within the provisions of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - credit allowed - AT

Denial of CENVAT Credit - Whether certain pollution control services availed by the appellant are eligible to CENVAT Credit under CENVAT Credit Rules 2004 - Held Yes,...

Entitlement of Cenvat credit of duty paid on provisionally assessed Bill of Entry - Rule 9 of the Cenvat Credit Rules - Credit allowed..... - AT

CENVAT credit - appellant is entitled to avail cenvat credit on these cables either as capital goods or input as per cenvat credit rules 2004 - AT

Quick Updates: