AO was not justified in treating the payment of incentives to ...

Income Tax

June 24, 2014

AO was not justified in treating the payment of incentives to the dealers as well as to another distributor, as payment of commission liable to TDS under section 194H of the Act - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

AO was not justified in treating the payment of incentives to ...

Income Tax

June 24, 2014

You may also like:

Allowability of dealers incentive - scope in remand proceedings - this tribunal in remand directions made it clear that the impugned dealers incentive had much accrued...

Renting of immovable property service - The appellant entered into agreements with the film distributors under which the film distributors granted copyright license in...

Agents incentive expenses - AO has not established that the payments made to the related parties are excessive or unreasonable under the three criterias specified in...

Service tax liability - the target incentives received by the authorized dealer cannot be subjected to service tax under the category of "BAS" - AT

Valuation of goods - inclusion in the assessable value of the expenses incurred on ‘advertisement and publicity’, ‘incentive and discount to dealers’ and vehicle and...

TDS on Dealer Incentive and Service Coupons - disallowance under Section 40 (a)(ia) r.w.s. 194 H and 194C - matter of incentives allowed by the assessee to its dealers...

CIT is justified in holding the payment on net present value as afforestation charges in respect of the mining lessees already obtained has been decided and is treated...

Whether grant-in-aid received by the assessee is an incentive for conducting research so as to be treated as capital receipt and not as revenue receipt - Held yes - HC

Addition u/s 40A(3) - Payment not made in cash but paid to third parties on behalf of supplier of goods – AO was not justified in invoking the section 40A(3) - AT

Valuation - includibility - advertisement expenses - the 50% is borne by the dealers/distributors which is the expenses of the dealers/distributors and the appellant is...

Quick Updates: