Addition u/s 68 of the Act - AO does not have power to examine ...

Income Tax

July 17, 2014

Addition u/s 68 of the Act - AO does not have power to examine the source of the source and on the facts of the case, there is no merit in the Revenue’s grounds at all - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 68 of the Act - AO does not have power to examine ...

Income Tax

July 17, 2014

You may also like:

Addition u/s 68 - the assessee is not required to explain source of source of the fund gets buttressed by the amendment made in section 68 with effect from 01.04.2013,...

Addition u/s 68 - share capital and share premium - any addition which deserved to be made should have been made in the hands of the share applicants who have shown...

Addition u/s 68 - cash advance received from the customers - it cannot be expected from a seller to examine the creditworthiness of the buyers prior to selling any goods...

Addition u/s 68 - investment made by the partners - AO has examined 79 unsecured creditors who appeared before the AO and given statements on oath. All of them have...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

Addition u/s 68 - it is contended before AO that advances (cash credit) were made against the purchase of goods - AO and the Appellate Authority have the power of Civil...

Addition u/s 68 - Unexplained credit - scope of amended provisions of section 68 - onus to prove source of source - Although, the issue before us pertains to assessment...

Additions u/s 68 - unsecured loans - unexplained cash credit - proof of source of source or origin of the cash credits – Very genuineness of the transaction was not...

Undisclosed income u/s 68 - In the present case the assessee has explained the nature and source of the amount in question and to substantiate his contention submitted...

Addition u/s 68 r.w.s. 115BBE - The assessee had explained the source of deposits of cash and the AO did not discharge the burden by examining the family members. Since...

Quick Updates: