Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Whatever may have been the justification ...

Income Tax

September 26, 2014

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Whatever may have been the justification in adding the figures so arrived at, to the income of the appellant, there was no justification to initiate the proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act - the Tribunal proceeded on hyper- technicalities - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Whatever may have been the justification ...

Income Tax

September 26, 2014

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee disclosed all the true facts relating to the land - it may be a good case for making addition since there was difference between the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Having capitalized the amount of foreign exchange fluctuation in the relevant block of assets reveals its clear intent of treating it as capital...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - recording of specific finding or not? - In para 7 of the penalty order u/s. 271(1)(c), the Assessing Officer held that it is found to be a fit...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - when we examine penalty levied on account of salary disallowance AO has merely made adhoc addition by way of guess work and the AO has not...

Penalty u/s 271AAA or 271(1)(c) - The penalties u/s 271(1)(c) and 271AAA are attracted in different situations and both are mutually exclusive. Having initiated the...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - Scope of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act cannot be widened later to include within its scope such additions which were not...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - accrual of income for assessee society - In assessee`s appeal assessing officer treated contribution towards welfare Fund and Hospital Fund as...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The assessee clearly had a bonafide explanation for not adding the unpaid tax liabilities to its income since it was contesting the very...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non comply with notice u/s 142(1) - the failure of the assessee to comply with such notice cannot be said to be a default which may justify the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - estimation of income - bogus purchases - penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act cannot be levied where the addition is made on estimate basis - AT

Levy penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - since no specific satisfaction has been recorded by the Ld. Assessing Officer either in the body of the assessment order or in the show...

Quick Updates: