Penalty u/s 54(1)(14) of UP VAT - import of goods into the ...

VAT and Sales Tax

October 20, 2014

Penalty u/s 54(1)(14) of UP VAT - import of goods into the State by road against a declaration form - contravention of the provisions of Section 50 - The guilty mind is necessary to be established to impose penalty under Section 54(1)(14) of the Act - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 54(1)(14) of UP VAT - import of goods into the ...

VAT and Sales Tax

October 20, 2014

You may also like:

Levy of penalty u/s 54(1) (14) of the U.P. VAT Act - The court held that in the absence of a cogent finding of an intention to evade tax, the levy of penalty under...

Imposition of penalty u/s 54(1)(14) of UPVAT - By keeping column 6 of Form 38 blank, such declaration form can be repeatedly used for successive import so as to evade...

Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(14) - no papers were produced despite the fact that goods were being imported from outside the State - There is always apprehension that in...

Levy of Value Added Tax (VAT) - The State Government cannot enrich by wrongly bringing the transportation charges and the installation charges as part of sale price of...

Imposition of penalty under Section 54(1) (14) of UP VAT Act - The Tribunal has only observed that non-filing of various columns in Form 38 indicates that there was...

Transit Declaration form – Possession before entry – Seizure for non-compliance – UP VAT - Act does not specifically provide for seizure of goods for not carrying...

Levy of penalty u/s 54(1)(14) of the UP VAT Act, 2008 - Unfilled (blank) column No.8 of Form 38 - The Tribunal has not correctly applied the law in this regard, as they...

Registration certificate cancelled - Without invoking the provisions under Section 39(14) as well as 39(15) of the Tamilnadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006, the Registration...

Import of spares for the existing machinery procured indigenously under EPCG Scheme. - Cir. No. 54 (RE-2010)/2009-14 Dated: February 23, 2012

Mis-declaration of value of imported goods - Since the appellants deliberately suppressed the value by mis-declaring, the goods were liable for confiscation. - AT

Quick Updates: