Merely because the AO did not agree with the submission made by ...

Income Tax

December 30, 2014

Merely because the AO did not agree with the submission made by the assessee, the same cannot be said to be furnished of inaccurate particulars of income for the purpose of levying penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Merely because the AO did not agree with the submission made by ...

Income Tax

December 30, 2014

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - non specification of charge - AO has miserably failed to specify in the notice issued under section 274 read with...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - merely on the basis of additions, AO would not ipso facto lead to the conclusion that the assessee has concealed the particulars of income...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Necessity of recording satisfaction - AO Statement that the assessee has consciously made the concealment by furnishing inaccurate particulars of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Explanation is bonafide is, we find, supported by the fact that during assessment proceedings the assessee, realizing his mistake even before...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is liable to be imposed only where the assessee has concealed its particulars of income or furnished inaccurate particulars. Action of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Act is leviable to be imposed only where the assessee has concealed its particulars of income or furnished...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Whether 'mens rea' or deliberate attempt is not essential for levy of penalty - A mere making of the claim, which is not sustainable in law, by...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition on account of addition under the head “Land Compensation and Rehabilitation Expenses” - mere making of the claim, which is not...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - not entitled for the deduction U/s 54 - claim deduction allowed U/s 54F - once, the assessee has explained the reasons for making a wrong claim...

Levy of penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - disallowance made u/s. 35(2AB) - The Tribunal referred to the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Reliance...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Once, all the documentary evidences were produced before the AO and sales are no doubted, it is doubtful, whether the purchases are bogus...

Validity of the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) or 158BFA - AO has levied the penalty under section 271(1)(C) of the Act by observing that the assessee has concealed/furnished...

Mere erroneous claim in the absence of any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars is not a ground for levying penalty especially when there is nothing on...

Quick Updates: