Register My Bookmarks My Queries (D. Forum) My Replies (D. Forum) My Articles My Inbox (PM) Feedback/ Suggestions
Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


Case Laws Acts Notifications Circulars Classification Forms Manuals Articles News D. Forum Highlights Notes
TMI - e-Newsletter     TaxTMI    The Madras High Court addressed a case involving...     TaxTMI    The Karnataka High Court determined tax and penalty...     TaxTMI    The Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue,...     TaxTMI    Instruction No. 15/2024-Customs, issued by the...     TaxTMI    The Delhi High Court held that the Indian...     TaxTMI    The ITAT Delhi ruled on the correct classification...     TaxTMI    The Madras High Court found a violation of natural...     TaxTMI    The High Court quashed penalty u/s E-Way Bill...     TaxTMI    The case involves a challenge to the extension of...     TaxTMI    The ITAT Ahmedabad addressed the validity of an...     TaxTMI    The Gujarat High Court held that the applicant, as...     TaxTMI    The ITAT Delhi considered the validity of a...     TaxTMI    The notification u/s 3 & 5 of CGST Act and u/s 3 of...     TaxTMI    The case concerns the liability of an exporter to...     TaxTMI    The Instruction issued by the Government of India...     TaxTMI    Latest Case-Laws     TaxTMI    Latest Notifications + Circulars     TaxTMI    GST Council Decisions     TaxTMI       Right Stop
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Service Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights May 2015 Year 2015 This

When the entire demand covering the period October, 2002 to ...

Case Laws     Service Tax

May 26, 2015

When the entire demand covering the period October, 2002 to December, 2006 is a meagre ₹ 19,576/- the demand for a mere 3 months will be pittance or less making it ridiculous to remand the case for computation thereof - AT

View Source

 

← Previous Next →

 

You may also like:

  1. In assessment year 2002-03 the total contribution to the pension fund during the year was ₹ 1.22 crores out of which ₹ 22,89,137/- were actually disbursed to...

  2. Requirement of pre-deposit - Direction to deposit 75% of the awarded amount in terms of Section 19 of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 -...

  3. Liability to pay Service Tax when the main contractor has already paid - The Tribunal cited a circular stating sub-contractors are liable to pay Service Tax separately....

  4. Refund of CENVAT credit accumulated - the claim which was returned for the period from October 2006 to December 2006 cannot be held as resubmitted where the part of the...

  5. Initiation of CIRP - Period of limitation - It cannot be gainsaid that the Respondent/Financial Creditor, after considering the proposal of the Appellant for ‘One Time...

  6. Demand of service tax - brokerage received on IPO related service - Business Auxiliary Services - appellant’s activity is neither covered u/s 65(19)(i) as they are not...

  7. Whether the re-assessment proceedings initiated against the petitioner are barred by limitation? - The amendment made to Section 40 of the Act, cannot be construed so as...

  8. Demand under Business Auxiliary Services (BAS) 65(19) without specifying which specific sub-clause covers the activities, demand is not sustainable

  9. Small Scale exemption - determination of turnover upto ₹ 4 crores of previous financial year - There was no justification in including the value of clearance...

  10. Amends Notification No. 21/2002-Customs, dated the 1st March, 2002 - Ntf. No. 120 /2011 Dated: December 30, 2011

  11. Amends Notification No. 20/2006-Customs, dated the 1st March, 2006 - Ntf. No. 118/ 2011 Dated: December 29, 2011

  12. Rescinds notification no. 78/2006-Customs, dated the 8th August, 2006 - Ntf. No. 108/2011 Dated: December 5, 2011

  13. No over the counter exchange of old ₹ 500 and ₹ 1000 notes after midnight of 24.11.2016;.Certain other exemptions continued till 15th December, 2016 with...

  14. Reversal of input tax credit (ITC) - A plain reading of the section 19(2)(v) as it stood during the period in dispute and thereafter shows that it applies only to the...

  15. Import of coal - coking coal or not - coal imported by appellants under 19 Bills of Entry is eligible for the benefit of exemption notification under 21/2002-Cus - AT

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates

What's New:
    Latest Case Laws
What's New:
    Latest Notifications
What's New:
    Latest Circulars
H: Notification: Amendment in item description of 'Glufosinate Technical'...
H: Amendment in Appendix 6B of FTP/HBP, 2023: Value addition requirements...
C: Amendment in Appendix - 6B of FTP/ HBP, 2023.
N: Amendment in item description of Glufosinate Technical covered under H...
F: Composition scheme
F: Customer Free of charge supply - scheme to be mentioned in Shipping bi...
A: No Service Tax payable on freight margin recovered from the customer i...
A: EVERY ERRONEOUS DECISION BY LOWER COURT NOT AMENABLE TO WRIT OF CERTIO...
A: A NEW HORIZON FOR AI REGULATIONS
A: Remedy cannot be availed under writ jurisdiction when alternate remedi...
H: Seizure order declared illegal by High Court. BI (EO) lacked authority...
H: Deduction u/s 11(1) on accumulated income. Donations not hit by Explan...
H: Restriction on set-off of loss from house property upheld as constitut...
H: Salary income: One-time payment to ESOP holders not taxable as perquis...
H: Interest received on compensation from auction sale deemed capital rec...
H: Reassessment proceedings u/s 147 after 4 years lacked fresh material. ...
H: Validity of reassessment u/s 148 challenged - AY 2013-14 beyond block ...
H: Legal right to challenge auction of HUF properties granted. Lis Penden...
H: Addition as unexplained income was unjustified. Lack of proof on trans...
H: Exemption u/s 54F for investment in residential house denied. Property...
H: Discrepancy in Form 26AS & income return resolved. Salary disallowance...
H: Payments to overseas entities not liable for TDS, deemed as relocation...
H: Disallowance of royalty payment & TDS u/s 195 upheld in favor of asses...
F: treatment of liability in case of transfer of business
F: ITC disalowed us/ 16(4) due filled return after cutoff date.
A: Reasonable accounting estimates are acceptable under provisions relati...
A: Share Transfer Vs Share TransmissionShare Transfer Vs Share Transmissi...
A: Department should seek document/clarification if required from assesse...
A: Does MRA answer the BIS Conundrum for Foreign Manufacturers
A: HOW WILL GST APPELLATE TRIBUNALS FUNCTION