There should be some evidence on the basis of which the action ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 20, 2015

There should be some evidence on the basis of which the action of the AO can be held to be justified to show that the expenses are unreasonable or excessive u/s 40A(2)(b). In the absence of any such evidence, an adhoc disallowance of 5% has rightly been rejected by the CIT(A) - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

There should be some evidence on the basis of which the action ...

Case Laws Income Tax

June 20, 2015

You may also like:

Agents incentive expenses - AO has not established that the payments made to the related parties are excessive or unreasonable under the three criterias specified in...

Disallowance u/s 40A(2)(b) - there should be some material available before the AO for invoking section 40A(2)(a) to initiate action to disallow or refuse to deduct the...

Revision u/s 263 - Excessive payment to related party or not - Payments for job work not verified by AO at "fair market value" under section 40A(2)(b) - the onus is on...

Disallowance u/s 40A(2)(b) - excessive or unreasonable payments made to specified persons - AO has not done any exercise to determine as to whether the amount paid by...

Addition u/s 40A(2) - disallowance of interest claim of 9% - ITAT has rightly concluded that the provisions like Section 40A are meant to check evasion of tax through...

Addition u/s 40A(2) - Allegation of Excessive price paid to related parties - The provisions of section 40A(2) of the Act applies for making disallowance of expenses for...

Disallowance u/s. 40(A)(2)(b) - excessive salary payment - payment to close associates / related parties - AO can disallow only that portion of the total expenditure,...

IT - Sec. 40A(2) - increase in remuneration to Directors - when CLB had approved the remuneration it could not be said that the expenditure was excessive or unreasonable - AT

Disallowance u/s 40A(2)(b) - for the purpose of disallowing a deduction, AO has to form an opinion not only that the expenditure is excessive or unreasonable, but that...

Estimation of Profit/Section 40A(2)(b) - JV entered - sub-contracting - AO had formed a view that the assessee JV had suppressed its profit by making excessive payment...

Addition u/s 40(A) - service charges paid to division of the holding company - assessee has been able to demonstrate that the services were charged by SCS to the...

Excessive expenditure u/s 40A(2)(b) - the net profit amounted to only 0.13% of a massive turnover of about ₹ 103 crores. On such a premise, the conclusion that the...

Disallowing interest paid on borrowed monies - loan from related persons - Section 40A(2)(b) does not envisage the complete disallowance of expenditure unless it is...

Disallowance u/s 40A(2)(b) - related party - AO has not brought any comparables from the market to make out that the current payment is excessive and unreasonable within...

Disallowance of salary paid to relative - excessive and unreasonable expenses - Wife of son of the partner does not fall within the definition of the relative as defined...

Quick Updates: