Since Commissioner (Appeals) has not followed the law declared ...

Case Laws Central Excise

September 29, 2015

Since Commissioner (Appeals) has not followed the law declared by the Larger Bench, exemplary cost of ₹ 2500/- imposed for burdening the appellant for unnecessary litigation costs, for burdening the Tribunal as also for showing scant respect for the law declared by the higher authorities - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Since Commissioner (Appeals) has not followed the law declared ...

Case Laws Central Excise

September 29, 2015

You may also like:

Appeal of the Bank under the SARFAESI Act - The present case, is a classic example how the judicial system is getting clogged with frivolous litigation. The facts and...

Quantum of cost imposed by High Court on the GST officer - intent to evade tax or not - allegation that the e-way bill had expired a day earlier - traffic blockage due...

Maintainability of appeal before tribunal - Seizure of goods - Section 110(A) - Two member bench disagrees with the decision of larger bench - matter referred to the...

Referring matter to larger bench - It is not open to the Referral Bench to appreciate the judgment rendered by the earlier Bench as if sitting in appeal to hold that the...

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - The delay in preferring legal remedies though is inexcusable without sufficient reasons, yet it is also a settled principle of...

Reference the matter to the larger bench of 3 members by the Single Member Bench - Even if the learned Member hearing this appeal found it difficult to accept the view...

Imposition of costs on the Department - provisional attachment - a fine question of law has been raised by the assesses in their appeal arising out of the very same...

Reduction in penalty imposed - Validity of order passed by CESTAT - The maximum possible penalty was ₹ 15.30 crores but the adjudicating authority imposed a total...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - deduction u/s 80P - appeal of assessee was allowed following order of High Court, subsequently, that decision was reversed by the...

Rectification u/s 254 - violation of the provisions of section 255(3) - appeal heard by a Single Member Bench instead of Division Bench - since the income assessed in...

Appointment of a arbitrator - requirement of sufficient stamping of documents - Although we agree that there is a need to constitute a larger Bench to settle the...

Judgment of the Larger Bench of Tribunal on Aluminum dross and skimming – reg. - Order-Instruction

The Chief Justice, in his administrative capacity, cannot constitute a Larger Bench for the purpose of deciding a pure question of law simply because the Chief Justice...

The CESTAT Chandigarh, in a majority decision, in an appellate tribunal decision, allowed the appeal regarding the rejection of a refund claim for duty paid on outward...

Supply or not - Refundable Interest Free Deposit (assume ₹ 2500) - the amount of ₹ 2500/- will not attract the GST being the deposit unless the supplier...

Quick Updates: