Home Highlights November 2015 Year 2015 This

You may also like:

1. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Unexplained bank deposits - PCIT, without making further inquiry on his own account, has simply stated in the impugned order that the Assessing...

2. Revision u/s 263 - carry forward of losses on sale of shares - where there are two possible views and the Assessing Officer has taken one of the possible views, no...

3. Revision u/s 263 - assessee has made purchases in cash - when the learned assessing officer was not required to enquire on those issues such as purchases in cash more...

4. Revision u/s 263 - bogus purchase - proof of nexus between the purchases and sales - once submission/reply filed by the assessee, pursuant to enquiry by the Assessing...

5. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - sale of impugned land measuring 10.162 acres below the stamp duty value - under the given circumstances, it can be safely concluded that the...

6. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - an order which is prejudicial to the interests of the revenue - As far as adequacy of inquiry is considered, there is no law which provides the...

7. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Pr.CIT has ignored the replies of the assessee and he has not discussed as to why he does not agree with the contentions of the assessee. The...

8. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - The order passed by the ld. Assessing Officer while completing the reassessment u/s 143(3) r.w. section 147, neither suggests that any such...

9. Addition u/s 68 - cash credit in the books of accounts - issue of shares warrant - As assessee has submitted the complete details before the assessing officer and...

10. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Assessing Officer to usurp the jurisdiction to reopen the assessment - The first Assessing Officer has made the reassessment after...

11. Validity of Revision u/s 263 - Whether inquiry or verification was not made by the Assessing Officer - Appellant, Revenue, is not in a position to point out as to what...

12. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Addition u/s 68 - the transaction has never been examined by the assessing officer. No enquiry has been conducted relating to the alleged sum....

13. Deduction u/s.35 AD(5)(aa) - whole of capital expenditure incurred for purpose of development of hotel claimed - We restore the issue to file of the Assessing Officer...

14. Revision u/s 263 - addition u/s 68 - The Assessing Officer has taken a possible view. When the Assessing Officer follows the direction of the Ld. Pr. CIT, in his order...

15. Revision u/s 263 - case of “no enquiry” - admittedly Assessing Officer at assessment stage has not verified amount shown under “suspense account”. It is very apparent...