The question, whether the petitioners can be said to be ...

Companies Law

February 1, 2016

The question, whether the petitioners can be said to be Directors of the subject company is doubtful and without the petitioners / applicants having a clear right to act as Directors and which is being opposed, the question of the petitioners / applicants incurring any disqualification or liability under Section 162 of the Act also, would not arise. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

The question, whether the petitioners can be said to be ...

Companies Law

February 1, 2016

You may also like:

Cessation of directorship of the 3rd respondent - seeking approval of e-Form DIR-12 filed by the petitioner - The petitioner company, through its Board of Directors and...

Siphoning of funds - collection of money from the public issue by publishing prospects in the year 1994 by the directors and promoters of the Company - petitioner was...

Effective date of Resignation from the post of Managing Director - Compiling Proceedings against the Director / Petitioner for Non-appointment of Woman Director in the...

Dishonour of Cheque - Vicarious liability - petitioner is an Independent Non-Executive Director - - the petitioner was appointed as Additional Director and resigned as...

- Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability of Director - The Petitioner resigned from the Company on 05.02.2016. Therefore, as per the details regarding the Directors of...

Effect of resignation from Directorship - ROC refused to remove the name of the Petitioner as a Director of Respondent No. 4-company - The High court acknowledged the...

Disqualification upon the petitioners for acting as Directors of Companies - Deactivation of DIN - Section 164(2) must be given only prospective operation and the...

Dishonor of Cheque - insufficiency of funds - Vicarious liability of directors - It is not the case of the petitioner herein that he is a non-executive director. The...

Dishonor of Cheque - Vicarious liability of Director - The primary liability in a cheque bounce case where cheque has been issued on behalf of the company is upon the...

Dishonor of Cheque - vicarious liability - Whether the company is not functioning from January 2014 and the petitioner were not directors in the company at that point of...

Dishonour of Cheque - Liability of a Director - principles of vicarious liability - petitioner had already resigned on 15.03.2014 as Director of the Company and was...

Oppression and mismanagement - removal of the Petitioner from the Directorship - the instant Company Petition is maintainable U/s.241 of the Companies Act, 2013, and the...

Levy of GST - Reverse Charge Mechanism (RCM) - whole-time director - A director who has taken an employment in the company may be functioning in dual capacities, namely,...

Dishonor of Cheque - insufficient funds - vicarious liability of the petitioner u/s 141 of NI Act after tendering such resignation - the complainant should specifically...

Dishonor of Cheque - Directors of the company have been made parties in the said case - Merely because the petitioner No.1 is the signatory of the cheque in question, is...

Quick Updates: