Refund - unjust enrichment - the impugned amount was deducted by ...

Case Laws Service Tax

February 12, 2016

Refund - unjust enrichment - the impugned amount was deducted by Revenue from the refunds of Bharat heavy electricals Ltd in terms of the powers u/s 87(d) of Finance Act 1994 and BHEL recovered the said amount from the appellant by deducting the same from the payments due to the appellant for providing security services - refund allowed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - unjust enrichment - the impugned amount was deducted by ...

Case Laws Service Tax

February 12, 2016

You may also like:

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

CESTAT NEW DELHI addressed unjust enrichment in a refund claim. The appellant sought a refund of Rs. 1,23,70,024 u/s the Tribunal's order. The appellant failed to prove...

Refund - Principles of Unjust enrichment - Rubber cess - The appellant have clearly shown the amount of refund as receivable in their Books of Accounts and the same was...

Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - case of respondent-assessee is that at the stage of payment of refund, which is already sanctioned, the issue of unjust enrichment is...

Refund - when the iron ore was exported on payment of duty on FOB value, the refund of excess customs duty paid does not attract bar of unjust enrichment - refund allowed.

Refund of service tax - amount have been deposited by mistake - Form 26AS, VAT-41, copies of challans and copies of running bills prepared by the Housing Board showing...

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Refund claim - Cess - unjust enrichment - The amount realized from the foreign buyer was only FOB value - the refund of cess is not hit by unjust enrichment

Unjust enrichment - refund claim - bar of unjust enrichment not applicable to imported capital goods used captively by the importer - refund cannot be denied.

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Refund of duty - unjust enrichment - Crying fire is of no avail if one cannot show even a streak of smoke - department failed to prove its case of unjust enrichment -...

Refund – doctrine of unjust enrichment would not apply to fine and penalty - AT

CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that refund of Special Additional Duty (SAD) on goods sold with VAT charged is permissible u/s Notification No.102 of 2007 Cus. The tribunal found...

Quick Updates: