Test of Unjust enrichment - Refund consisting differential fine ...

Customs

March 19, 2016

Test of Unjust enrichment - Refund consisting differential fine and penalty - proviso to sub-section (2) of Section 27 of Customs Act, 1962 deals with applicability of test of unjust enrichment to the duty and interest element but not to differential fine or penalty. - Refund allowed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Test of Unjust enrichment - Refund consisting differential fine ...

Customs

March 19, 2016

You may also like:

Refund – doctrine of unjust enrichment would not apply to fine and penalty - AT

Applicability of unjust enrichment on refund of fine and penalty - in the case of refund of fine and penalty unjust enrichment is not applicable.... - AT

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Refund claim - Cess - unjust enrichment - The amount realized from the foreign buyer was only FOB value - the refund of cess is not hit by unjust enrichment

Unjust enrichment - refund claim - bar of unjust enrichment not applicable to imported capital goods used captively by the importer - refund cannot be denied.

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Denial of refund claim - Unjust enrichment - Duty paid twice - e appellants are entitled for refund claim for duty paid on Ethanol - unjust enrichment is not applicable - AT

Refund of duty - unjust enrichment - Crying fire is of no avail if one cannot show even a streak of smoke - department failed to prove its case of unjust enrichment -...

Refund of duty – principle of unjust enrichment is not applicable to refund of interest and redemption fine- - AT

Refund claim - Principles of unjust enrichment - Imported goods as ''wireless telephone'' - The Tribunal's findings indicated that the appellant had paid duty without...

Rejection of refund of penalty deposited - applicability of principles of unjust enrichment - the provisions of unjust enrichment are not attracted as the burden of...

Refund of Excise Duty - unjust enrichment - As it is on record that excess duty and differential excess amount received by the appellant has been refunded to the dealers...

Refund - Principles of Unjust enrichment - Rubber cess - The appellant have clearly shown the amount of refund as receivable in their Books of Accounts and the same was...

Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

Quick Updates: