Claim of refund of excess duty of customs paid - exemption from ...

Customs

June 20, 2016

Claim of refund of excess duty of customs paid - exemption from customs duty - assessee has not challenged the assessment before any appellate Forum - refund allowed - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Claim of refund of excess duty of customs paid - exemption from ...

Customs

June 20, 2016

You may also like:

Refund claim in respect of excess paid duty - proceeding of rebate and proceeding of refund are two different proceedings - appellant have rightly claimed the refund of...

Refund - when the iron ore was exported on payment of duty on FOB value, the refund of excess customs duty paid does not attract bar of unjust enrichment - refund allowed.

Suo moto credit versus filing of refund claim - suo moto credit can be taken if duty is paid twice as excess duty paid is not a duty and same is deposit - AT

Refund claim - excess duty paid due to downward revision of price - They have furnished CA certificate to substantiate that the incidence of duty has not been passed on...

Refund claim - excess duty paid at 5% instead of 1% - the appellant is liable to pay Basic Customs duty at the rate of 1% and have paid the excess duty. Therefore, the...

Refund in cash - export of goods - refund of duty paid in excess through cenvat credit - voluntary excess payment of duty - re-credit allowed - no cash refund - CGOVT

Refund claim - price variation clause - appellant entitled to refund of the excess duty paid due the deductions towards non achievement of GPF - AT

Refund claim rejected as time bared - Since amount was paid as duty to Custom by the importer, the provision of section 27 of the Custom Act, are applicable - AT

Rebate of duty paid on export goods - Petitioner paid lesser duty on domestic product and higher duty on export product which was not payable - Cash refund of excess...

Refund of Excess Customs Duty paid - principles of unjust enrichment - Following proceedings before the Settlement Commission, it was determined that the appellant had...

Quick Updates: