Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2017 Year 2017 This

Merely because assessee had claimed expenditure which was not ...

Income Tax

January 6, 2017

Merely because assessee had claimed expenditure which was not accepted or not acceptable to Revenue that by itself would not attract a penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

  2. Levy of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - What is clear is that the assessee has disclosed necessary facts in relation to various expenses including expenditure relatable to...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Revenue expenditure or not - expenses on NPA’s - merely because the assessee has claimed the expenditure, which claim was not accepted or not...

  4. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because assessee claimed depreciation at 25% treating items to be plant, which claim was not acceptable to revenue, would not by itself...

  5. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee had sold a plot of land in respect of which deduction u/s 54B claimed - withdrawal of deduction u/s 54B - merely because the assessee...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - wrong claim of set off loss - explanation was not found false - no iota of evidence of concealment of any fact relating to particulars of income...

  7. Nature of expenditure - Disallowance of expenditure under the "head repairs and maintenance"- AO rejected the assessee's contention and held that the assessee is...

  8. Nature of expenditure - assessee itself has capitalized in the financial statements to the expenditure incurred but the assessee has claimed it as a revenue expenditure...

  9. Non-deduction of TDS - Disallowing u/s. 40(a)(ia) - If the AO accepts the contention of assessee that expenditure was capitalized, then there is no necessity to examine...

  10. Revenue or capital expenditure – software development expenditure – Assessee had treated the expenditure as a deferred revenue expenditure in the books of account and...

  11. Revenue expenditure versus capital expenditure - expenditure incurred on ERP Software – allowed as revenue expenditure - AT

  12. Nature of expenses - Litigation expenses - Revenue or capital expenditure - In the present facts, since assessee has no interest in the ownership of the asset but he is...

  13. Disallowing claim of expenditure - non-carrying of business activity during the year under reference - The case involved an appeal by an assessee against the...

  14. Nature of expenditure - Revenue expenditure or capital expenditure - The ITAT held that, it is now well settled that revenue expenditure is allowable in entirety in the...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non specification of charge - defective notice - Merely because the assessee claimed the expenditure by virtue of a change of head of income and...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates