Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has not placed any material ...

Income Tax

January 30, 2017

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has not placed any material suggesting that the issue is debatable in view of the fact that there is a direct nexus between the advance bearing funds and the loan advanced to the partner. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - assessee has not placed any material ...

Income Tax

January 30, 2017

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - the proposition suggesting to read the mandate of copyright royalty cases in the context of industrial royalty cases is grossly misconceived. -...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - failure to comply with the notices issued by the A.O u/s 142(1) - the non-compliance on the part of the assessee is due to the reason of...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) - Nature of interest income - capital receipt or revenue receipt - This being a highly debatable issue and once there is a debate as assessee’s...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - Unexplained Expenditure on Stamp Duty and Registration Charges made out of Undisclosed Income - There was no dishonest intent of the assessee...

Deletion of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Issues on basis of which ALP shown by the assessee has been rejected are debatable - No penalty - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - As a matter of fact the notice issued u/s 274 read with section 271 of the Act itself was ambiguous as it did not make it clear as to under which...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee had failed to provide full submissions - penalty levied by the Assessing Officer u/s 271(1)(b) of the IT Act deserves to be...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - assessee did not comply with the notice issued u/s 142(1) of the Act requiring the assessee to furnish certain information - Neither the AO nor...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of excessive depreciation - cost of acquisition of wind mill - whether or not assessee is entitled to the benefit under proviso to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition on account of Transfer Pricing adjustment relating to payment of commission - it is evident that these are debatable issues - In any...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - the entire addition itself becomes debatable one. It is well settled proposition of law that the penalty u/s 271(1)(c)...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - the assessee has given evidences, on which no findings was given by Ld. CIT(A), in our view, the assessee reasonably explained the facts...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - non compliance of notices u/s 142(1) - the AO was not having the present address of the assessee - when the notice issued u/s 142(1) was not...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - TP Adjustment - it is a debatable issue whether reimbursement of expenses qualifies as FTS and there are various decisions which have held that...

Quick Updates: