Imposition of Penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 - quantum of penalty - ...

Central Excise

May 8, 2017

Imposition of Penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 - quantum of penalty - clandestine removal - appellant unknowingly got involved as an employee in the clandestine activity of his employers - the appellant is liable to penalty but at the same time the quantum of penalty imposed is quite high and harsh - penalty reduced to ₹ 2,50,000/- - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of Penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 - quantum of penalty - ...

Central Excise

May 8, 2017

You may also like:

Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of CER 2002 on transporters - clandestine removal - there is no evidence to prove that the lorry drivers or the owners had involved...

Imposition of penalty u/r 26(2) of CER, 2002 - CENVAT Credit - Wrong availment of credit and reversal thereof on being pointed out before the issue of SCN - maximum...

Penalty under rule 26 of the CER, 2002 can be imposed on a person only when it is proved beyond doubt that the person dealing with excisable goods knew or had reason to...

Penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 - Clandestine manufacture and removal - If providing blank challans/invoices to a company to enable them to remove the manufactured goods...

Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 - there is nothing on record to evidence the fact that ICICI Bank has played any role in getting the forged certificate -...

Imposition of penalty u/r 26 of CER, 2002 on transporter - contraband items - transporter can not be expected to be the expert of Central Excise laws to find out before...

Penalty u/r 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - appellant was Director during relevant period - Since the demand of the duty has already been settled under SVLDRS...

Levy of penalty in the absence of confiscation - penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 even in case where there is no proposal for confiscation can be...

Penalty - Bogus invoice issued without selling the goods – penalty would be attracted under Rule 25 (1) (d) as well as Rule 26(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - AT

Penalty under Rule 26(1) of Central excise rules 2002 - Bogus Cenvatable invoices issued - the appellant was liable to pay penalty - AT

Clandestine removal - Shortage of stock - Penalty - Rule 25 of CER, 2002 - stock valuation was by way of estimation basis - no case of clandestine removal and...

Imposition of personal penalty on 3 persons for duty evasion by the manufacturer - the requisite evidence necessary for levy of penalty on each of the Appellants under...

Levy of penalty on Director u/r 26 of CER - involvement of the director of the appellants in clandestine activities or not - here are not much reasoning has been...

Imposition of penalty under Rule 26 (2) of CER - availment of irregular CENVAT Credit - invoices without actual receipt of inputs - Though the opting of SVLDRS should...

Penalty u/r 27 of CER 2002 - Delay in submitting ARE-1 Applications against export of goods - contravention of Rule 19 of CER 2002 - The delay caused is nothing but...

Quick Updates: