Penalty - purchase of Gold Bullion - it is a case where the ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

July 19, 2017

Penalty - purchase of Gold Bullion - it is a case where the petitioner could not have been permitted to revise the return so as to cure the defects that were noticed by the assessing authority. The petitioner, therefore, had to suffer the consequences of any omission in the only valid return that was filed before the assessing authority. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty - purchase of Gold Bullion - it is a case where the ...

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax

July 19, 2017

You may also like:

Limitation Period for issuance of notice u/s 143(2) - Scrutiny Assessment - Relevant date - after filing of the return of income, defect notice u/s 139(9) had been sent...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice u/s 274 - Emphasizing the principles outlined by the Karnataka High Court, the Tribunal reaffirmed the importance of...

Validity of the assessment order passed u/s 143(3) - Assumption of jurisdiction to make an assessment - No return of income filed by assessee - Whether a curable defect...

When the AO rejects the revised return then the whole return is invalid. In case AO makes addition from the revised return then it means that he recognizes the revised...

Penalty levied u/s.271(1)(c) - revised return filed - assessee has adopted the recourse of avoiding litigation, therefore, revised the return to buy peace of mind - no...

Addition of amount shown in revised return under the pressure of the department - revised return should relate back to the return originally filed, minus the omissions...

Validity on assessment order u/s 153C r.w.s. 143(3) in the absence of notice u/s 143(2) - defective assessment order - whether curable defect u/s 292BB? - For Section...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) and 271AAB - Defective notice - The argument of the department that the provisions of section 292B of the Act will cure the defect, if any, in the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(C) - reopening of assessment u/s 147 after filing of revised return - Revised return was not filed in response to notice issued u/s.148 and therefore,...

Validity of Notice issued u/s 143(2) - Defective return - Removal of defect beyond 15 days u/s 139(9) - AO should have treated the return as non-est when the assessee...

Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made thereunder - revised return treated as non-est - the appellant filed his original return otherwise than u/s 139(1)...

Rectification of mistake u/s 154 - belated return u/s 139(4) - Subsequently revised - request of rectification based on revised return - not permissible as belated...

Revised return filed after expiry of one year - voluntary revised return u/s 139(5) or return filed in pursuance of notice u/s 148 - Revised return after approval of...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - difference in original return of income and revised return - Had it been the intention of the assessee to make a full and true disclosure...

Penalty u/s 271 - Defective notice - the allegation should be specific and clear in the penalty notice also because the assessee has to submit reply in the course of...

Quick Updates: