Since it was the choice of the assessee as to whether to file an ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 28, 2017

Since it was the choice of the assessee as to whether to file an objection before the DRP or to pursue the normal channel of filing appeal against the assessment order before the ld. CIT(A). Therefore, the appeal filed by the assessee before the ld. CIT(A) was maintainable.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Since it was the choice of the assessee as to whether to file an ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 28, 2017

You may also like:

Assessment order passed u/s 144C(2) - The assessee did not file the objections before the DRP within the prescribed time and therefore, the objections are not...

Provisional attachment of goods - bogus invoices - writ court granted relief to the respondent - as on date, the respondent have not complied with the order passed by...

Validity of assessment order u/s 144C - petitioner filed objection to the draft assessment order well within the time of thirty days before the DRP - The High Court held...

Right of department to file any appeal or cross-objections before the Commissioner (Appeals) against Refund order - the Department could neither have filed an appeal...

Non consideration of objections to the draft assessment order u/s 144 - since the objections were well within time, the action of the AO in proceeding with the final...

Maintainability of appeal before the CIT(A) u/s 246A - interlocutory order disposing off objections filed by assessee against reopening of the concluded assessment u/s...

Condonation of delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) - delay of 1950 days’ in filing the appeal - There is no quarrel on the point if the assessee has chosen a...

Validity of assessment order passed u/s 144C - due to oversight/inadvertence Petitioner did not inform the AO within 30 days period prescribed under Sub-section (2) of...

The monetary limit of ₹ 10 lakhs for filing appeals before the ITAT would apply equally to cross objections under section 253(4) of the Act. Cross objections below...

AO had no jurisdiction to frame the final assessment order on 27.01.2020 u/s. 144(3) of the Act, since he was divested of jurisdiction to pass final order between...

Condonation of delay - levy of late filing fee u/s 234E - Assessee has filed the appeal on the basis of default summary downloaded from Traces Income Tax Website....

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - The entire exercise of re-opening would depend upon the reasons recorded by the AO and therefore the reasons recorded to re-open the...

Rebate claim - All the Notifications providing multiple choices to an assessee for tax treatment of the same commodity have been issued by one and the same Department...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Reasons were supplied to the assessee only on 21.11.2017 and assessee on the same day filed the objections to the reopening of the...

Validity of the final assessment order due to non-service of the Dispute Resolution Panel’s (DRP) directions - AR candidly admitted before the Tribunal that, on the...

Quick Updates: