Penalty u/s 78 - they were under bonafide belief that service ...

Service Tax

December 10, 2018

Penalty u/s 78 - they were under bonafide belief that service provided from SEZ unit is not chargeable to Service Tax. Therefore the payment of Service Tax was escaped under bonafide belief without any malafide intention. - no penalty.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 78 - they were under bonafide belief that service ...

Service Tax

December 10, 2018

You may also like:

SEZ unit - Recovery of CENVAT Credit alongwith interest and penalty - the appellant is not claiming the benefit of the Exemption Notification, but is claiming CENVAT...

Levy of penalties u/s 77 and 78 - Bonafide belief - assessee had in fact recovered Service Tax periodically from the service recipient. Not only that such service tax...

Refund of service tax - SEZ unit - Time limitation - ab initio exemption provided under the SEZ provisions, having over riding effect on the service tax provision. Under...

SEZ unit - Legal services - liability pay tax under reverse charge mechanism on services received from advocate - The applicant contended that various provisions and...

Principle of mutuality does not apply for the services provided by the SEZ unit to the DTA unit of the same assessee since as per the scheme both the distinct and...

CBEC exempts service provided by certain association of dyeing units from whole of service tax.

Levy of GST - supply of goods or services to SEZ unit or SEZ developer - IGST Act - Whether or not the supply of goods and on-site services to customers in SEZ area to...

Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - evasion of service tax - appellant collected service tax from the service receivers but failed to deposit the...

SEZ unit - Refund of Service Tax - Service Tax paid on Banking and Other Financial Services - mere technical discrepancy in the invoices cannot be the ground for denying...

SEZ unit - Service tax liability - BSS - activities carried out by SEZ unit of assessee and availed by units of assessee situated in DTA area - no service tax could be...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Penalty u/s 78 - Once it is categorically held by Commissioner (Appeals) that appellant was under a bonafide belief that service tax as demanded was not payable, then a...

Services provided by SEZ unit are not entitled for automatic exemption by virtue of SEZ Act – They are liable to service tax like any other assesse – AAR

Reduction of penalty u/s 78 of FA - non-payment of service tax - appellant has not recorded the said transactions in their specified records - Penalty reduced to 50% of...

Refund of service tax paid - SEZ - In this case, the head office is located in Gurugram and it is not an SEZ unit. A portion of the services received in Gurugram are for...

Quick Updates: