Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - 100% deduction u/s 80IC - mistake in ...

Income Tax

April 11, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - 100% deduction u/s 80IC - mistake in counting the initial assessment year - realising mistake revise computation filed and paid tax before assessment - human error cannot partake the colour of intentional or willful claim - no penalty

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - 100% deduction u/s 80IC - mistake in ...

Income Tax

April 11, 2019

You may also like:

Deduction u/s 80IC - substantial expansion - Initial assessment year - in case substantial expansion is carried out as defined in clause (ix) of Sub-section-8 of Section...

Deduction u/s 80IC - Since in the present case the fact that the assessee had undertaken substantial expansion is not disputed, the assessee, we hold, is entitled to...

Deduction u/s 80IC - if substantial expansion is undertaken, say, in 8th year by an assessee such an assessee would be entitled to 100% deduction for the first five...

Claim of deduction @100% u/s 80IC - initial assessment year - fresh claim on undertaking substantial expansion from the year of completion of substantial expansion - Not allowed.

Deduction u/s 80IC - existence of multiple “initial assessment years” - AO has simply misunderstood the amendment brought u/s. 80IC and further misunderstood “the...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) or penalty u/s.271AAA - The provisions of Section 271AAA(3) of the Act specifically excludes the provisions of Section 271(1)(c) of the Act for the...

Deduction u/s 80IC - ‘initial assessment year’ - whether the initial Assessment Year can be re-fixed in case of substantial expansion? - Although, the Department has...

SLP against High Court decision that Two Initial Assessment Year is permissible in 80IC for 100 % deduction stand dismissed.

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - CIT(A) has given direction to the Assessing Officer to levy penalty equivalent to 100% tax under section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere estimate of...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - addition u/s 68 - Penalty has been levied in a mechanical manner without application of mind. In our view, this is a serious mistake in the...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non recording of satisfaction - When satisfaction for initiation of penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) of IT Act is recorded by the AO in...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 35 - AO has not brought out his case as to why penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - bonafide belief - restriction of claim of deduction u/s 80IC to 25% from 100% claimed on account of substantial expansion - differing orders...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(b) - no compliance to notice u/s 142(1) - The AO levied the penalty for non-compliance of notice dated 13.06.2016, however, there is no reference of...

Levying penalty u/s 272A(1) - non-compliance of the notice - Nonappearance of the assessee in response to the initial notice under section 142(1) of the Act was not...

Quick Updates: