Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding


  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2019 Year 2019 This

Penalty u/s 271G - assessee applied TNMM for determining of ALP ...

Income Tax

July 1, 2019

Penalty u/s 271G - assessee applied TNMM for determining of ALP - information/documents sought for determining of ALP as per CUP method - the difficulty in maintaining the information sought by the TPO has been well explained and analysed - allegation of the TPO that by non furnishing of documents has prevented him from determining the ALP under CUP method is unacceptable when he has accepted the benchmarking of the assessee - no penalty

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. TP Adjustment - TPO rejected the comparables selected by the assessee - As assessee, has applied the internal TNMM method as most appropriate and from the aforesaid rule...

  2. Penalty u/s. 271G - assessee did not provide any basis for comparing the transactions and it failed to provide any alternative method to benchmark the transactions which...

  3. Penalty levied u/s 271G - Assessee has failed to maintain the information as per Rule 10D (1) (d), (g), (h) and (m) of Income Tax Rules - ‘reaso-nable cause’ under...

  4. TP Adjustment - MAM Adjustment - ALP adjustment -In TNMM what is to be seen is the functional comparability and not the product comparability. Further, it is observed...

  5. Penalty u/s 271G - assessee was unable to submit internal TNMM by working out the profitability of AE and non-AE segment - due to peculiar nature of the product and...

  6. Penalty u/s 271G – Failure to maintain documents and accounts being audited - AO should have initiated penalty proceedings u/s 271AA/271BA – the penalty levied u/s 271G...

  7. Most appropriate method for determining the ALP of the royalty - Transfer of intangibles - matter remitted back to the AO/TPO for determination of ALP of royalty by...

  8. Penalty u/s 271G - non–maintenance of documents which the assessee is required to maintain under the statutory provisions, the Transfer Pricing Officer found it...

  9. Penalty u/s 271G - the basic requirement for penalty is that the assessee failed to submit the relevant information/document required u/s 992D(3) - the necessary...

  10. TP Adjustment - ALP is determined by TPO by not applying any method at all or by choosing a method which is not prescribed u/s.92C(1) of the Act, then such a...

  11. Penalty u/s 271AA - failure of the assessee to report the intentional transactions - As seen that the AO wrongly applied the amended Section 271AA which is effective...

  12. Penalty imposed u/s 271G - failure to furnish the information/documents required u/s 92D(1) r/w rule 10D - when the TPO has accepted the benchmarking of the assessee,...

  13. TP adjustment - Intragroup services filed by the assessee from its AE - Either way when the Revenue seeks to disturb the Most Appropriate Method adopted by the assessee,...

  14. Levy a penalty u/s 271G - default of non-submission of documents within stipulated period as required u/s 92D(3) - Though there is a delay on the part of the assessee to...

  15. TP adjustment - We are unable to concur with the aforesaid manner in which the TPO had determined the ALP of the referral services rendered by the AE, viz. CLSA, Hong...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates