Non-speaking order - Once the litigant before the Tribunal ...

Central Excise

July 13, 2019

Non-speaking order - Once the litigant before the Tribunal placed reliance upon the decision of the a coordinate Bench of the Tribunal, then a speaking order would require the Tribunal to consider those decisions and state how and why the aforesaid decisions are not applicable to the facts of the present case - In the absence of this exercise is being done, order itself suffer from being a non speaking order - quashed

View Source

← Previous Next →

Non-speaking order - Once the litigant before the Tribunal ...

Central Excise

July 13, 2019

You may also like:

Rectification application u/s 254 - Tribunal not followed the decision on the identical facts by the Coordinate Bench which is confirmed by this Court - The Court...

The ITAT Hyderabad addressed the issue of determining the correct head of income for gains on the sale of property, whether it should be classified as business income or...

Supremacy of decision division bench of a non-jurisdictional High Court and a single judge bench of a non-jurisdictional High Court - judicial hierarchy - Applicability...

Deduction u/s 80P - interest income - The tribunal noted that section 80P(2)(a)(i) allows deduction for cooperative societies engaged in banking or providing credit...

Power of Tribunal when it disagree with earlier decision of Tribunal - there are only two methods to disagree is either the decision is per in-curium or the decision is...

Refund of CENVAT Credit - the credit was reversed under GST Law at the time of filing refund claim. - It is very strange that the learned Commissioner (Appeals) has...

Reference the matter to the larger bench of 3 members by the Single Member Bench - Even if the learned Member hearing this appeal found it difficult to accept the view...

Judicial discipline - Where facts and law in a subsequent assessment year are the same, no authority whether quasi judicial or judicial can generally be permitted to...

Waiver of Pre-Deposit – Reference made by one Bench of Tribunal to Larger Bench, on ground that two Benches of coordinate jurisdiction had come to different conclusions...

Rectification u/s 254 - A mistake which is apparent from the record or not - non-consideration of an issue by the ITAT - As already pointed out above, there was no...

Initiation of anti-dumping investigation - the Designated Authority placed reliance upon certain material and facts for concluding the issue against the appellant -...

Maintainability of appeal before tribunal - Seizure of goods - Section 110(A) - Two member bench disagrees with the decision of larger bench - matter referred to the...

Computation of deduction u/s 80IB/80IC - allocation of advertisement expenses to the eligible units in the ratio of turnover of eligible units to the total turnover of...

Addition of sales tools expenses u/s 37 - the logic given by the coordinate bench equally applies to the sales tool expenses also. The above decision was also followed...

It is well settled in law that a decision of the court is only an authority for what it decides and not what can logically be deduced therefrom. It cannot be quoted for...

Quick Updates: